Predicativity , the Russell - Myhill Paradox , and
نویسنده
چکیده
1 Introduction ✤ Just as there is the Russell paradox about sets, so there is the Russell-Myhill paradox of propositions. ✤ While predicativity has been well-explored as a response to the Russell paradox of sets, there seems to have been no previous attempt to set out a predicative solution to the Russell-Myhill paradox of propositions. ✤ The aim of this talk is to do that, within the framework of Church's intensional logic.
منابع مشابه
Predicativity, the Russell-Myhill Paradox, and Church's Intensional Logic
This paper sets out a predicative response to the Russell-Myhill paradox of propositions within the framework of Church’s intensional logic. A predicative response places restrictions on the full comprehension schema, which asserts that every formula determines a higher-order entity. In addition to motivating the restriction on the comprehension schema from intuitions about the stability of ref...
متن کاملSet Theory and Higher-Order Logic: Foundational Issues and Mathematical Developments Program and Practical Information Contents
In 1990, W. Hugh Woodin introduced Omega-logic as an approach to truth in the universe of all sets inspired by recent work on large cardinals and determinacy. In Omega-logic statements are valid if, roughly, they hold in every forcing extension of the universe, or its sufficiently rich initial segments. Thus, Omega-logic is the logic of generic absoluteness. In this short course we will start w...
متن کاملMyhill-Nerode Fuzzy Congruences Corresponding to a General Fuzzy Automata
Myhill-Nerode Theorem is regarded as a basic theorem in the theories of languages and automata and is used to prove the equivalence between automata and their languages. The significance of this theorem has stimulated researchers to develop that on different automata thus leading to optimizing computational models. In this article, we aim at developing the concept of congruence in general fuzzy...
متن کاملPreliminary version, 03-04-19. All comments are welcome! FREGE’S PARADISE AND
The main objective of this paper is to examine how theories of truth and reference that are in a broad sense Fregean in character are threatened by antinomies; in particular by the Epimenides paradox and versions of the socalled Russell-Myhill antinomy, an intensional analogue of Russell’s more well-known paradox for extensions. Frege’s ontology of propositions and senses has recently received ...
متن کامل(Re) Making the Procrustean Bed? Standardization and Customization as Competing Logics in Healthcare
Recent years have witnessed a parallel and seemingly contradictory trend towards both the standardization and the customization of healthcare and medical treatment. Here, we explore what is meant by ‘standardization’ and ‘customization’ in healthcare settings and explore the implications of these changes for healthcare delivery. We frame the paradox of these divergent and opposing factors in te...
متن کامل